Pregnancy outcome in delayed start antagonist versus microdose flare GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: An RCT

Background: Over the years, many article on different aspects of pathogenesis and management of poor ovarian responders have been published but there is no clear guideline for treating themyet. Objective: This study was designated to compare the effectiveness of a delayed start protocol with gonadot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robab Davar (Author), Nosrat Neghab (Author), Elham Naghshineh (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, 2018-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1cef083d4d1a4f7096d926e4d35e2d07
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Robab Davar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nosrat Neghab  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elham Naghshineh  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Pregnancy outcome in delayed start antagonist versus microdose flare GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: An RCT 
260 |b Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2018-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2476-4108 
500 |a 2476-3772 
520 |a Background: Over the years, many article on different aspects of pathogenesis and management of poor ovarian responders have been published but there is no clear guideline for treating themyet. Objective: This study was designated to compare the effectiveness of a delayed start protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and microdose flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial consisted of 100 poor ovarian responder women in assisted reproductive technologies cycles. They were divided randomly in delayed-start antagonist protocol (with estrogen priming followed by early follicular-phase GnRH antagonist treatment for 7 days before ovarian stimulation) and microdose flare-up GnRH agonist protocol. The main outcome was clinical pregnancy rate and second outcome was the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, 2PN number, fertilization rate, and implantation rate. Results: Fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rates were not significantly different between the two studied protocols. Number of retrieved oocytes (5.10±3.41 vs. 3.08±2.51) with p=0.002, mature oocytes (4.32±2.69 vs. 2.34±1.80) with p=0.003, number of 2PN (3.94±1.80 vs. 2.20±1.01) with p=0.001 and implantation rate (19.40% vs. 10.30%) with p=0.022 were significantly higher in delayed antagonist group. Conclusion: The delayed-start protocol can improve ovarian response in poor responders by stimulating and synchronizing follicle development 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Infertility 
690 |a  Assisted reproductive technology 
690 |a  Gonadotropins 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
690 |a Reproduction 
690 |a QH471-489 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine, Vol 16, Iss 4, Pp 260-255 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://journals.ssu.ac.ir/ijrmnew/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-567&slc_lang=en&sid=1 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4108 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2476-3772 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1cef083d4d1a4f7096d926e4d35e2d07  |z Connect to this object online.