Academic Program Approval and Review Practices
This report outlines general and specific processes for both program approval and program review practices found in 50 states and eight foreign countries and regions. Models that depict these procedures are defined and the strengths and weakness of each are discussed. Alternatives to current pract...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
Arizona State University,
1999-08-01T00:00:00Z.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doaj_1cfaa891c96c47ce9edc8cda23e339f9 | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 | |a Don G. Creamer |e author |
| 700 | 1 | 0 | |a Steven M. Janosik |e author |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Academic Program Approval and Review Practices |
| 260 | |b Arizona State University, |c 1999-08-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
| 500 | |a 1068-2341 | ||
| 520 | |a This report outlines general and specific processes for both program approval and program review practices found in 50 states and eight foreign countries and regions. Models that depict these procedures are defined and the strengths and weakness of each are discussed. Alternatives to current practice by state agencies in the U.S. are described that might provide for greater decentralization of these practices while maintaining institutional accountability. | ||
| 546 | |a EN | ||
| 546 | |a ES | ||
| 546 | |a PT | ||
| 690 | |a Education | ||
| 690 | |a L | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
| 786 | 0 | |n Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 7, p 23 (1999) | |
| 787 | 0 | |n http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/558 | |
| 787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/1cfaa891c96c47ce9edc8cda23e339f9 |z Connect to this object online. |