Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques

Shear bond strength (SBS) testing is a commonly used method for evaluating different dental adhesive systems. Failure mode analysis provides valuable information for better interpretation of bond strength results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of specimen dimension and loading...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed M. Ismail (Author), Christoph Bourauel (Author), Ahmed ElBanna (Author), Tarek Salah Eldin (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1d3f39d595fa43db93f48e4375ae316d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ahmed M. Ismail  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Christoph Bourauel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ahmed ElBanna  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tarek Salah Eldin  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/dj9120140 
500 |a 2304-6767 
520 |a Shear bond strength (SBS) testing is a commonly used method for evaluating different dental adhesive systems. Failure mode analysis provides valuable information for better interpretation of bond strength results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of specimen dimension and loading technique on shear bond strength and failure mode results. Eighty macro and micro flowable composite cylindrical specimens of 1.8 and 0.8 mm diameter, respectively, and 1.5 mm length were bonded to dentinal substrate. Four study groups were created (<i>n</i> = 20): Macroshear wireloop, Gp1; Microshear wireloop, Gp2; Macroshear chisel, Gp3; and Microshear chisel, Gp4. They were tested for SBS using chisel and wireloop loading devices followed by failure mode analysis using digital microscopy and SEM. Two- and one-way ANOVA were used to compare stress at failure values of different groups while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare between failure modes of the tested groups. Gp4 recorded the highest mean stress at failure 54.1 ± 14.1 MPa, and the highest percentage of adhesive failure in relation to the other groups. Specimen dimension and loading technique are important parameters influencing the results of shear bond strength. Micro-sized specimens and chisel loading are recommended for shear testing. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a shear bond strength 
690 |a microshear bond strength 
690 |a fractography 
690 |a failure mode 
690 |a chisel loading 
690 |a wireloop loading 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dentistry Journal, Vol 9, Iss 12, p 140 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/9/12/140 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2304-6767 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1d3f39d595fa43db93f48e4375ae316d  |z Connect to this object online.