Accuracy of a markerless motion capture system in estimating upper extremity kinematics during boxing

Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity can be useful to assess the performance and skill levels of athletes during combat sports such as boxing. Although marker-based approach is widely used to obtain kinematic data, it is not suitable for "in the field" activities, i.e., when performed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhrigu K. Lahkar (Author), Antoine Muller (Author), Raphaël Dumas (Author), Lionel Reveret (Author), Thomas Robert (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1d9236e5579a40a19af9f91e8aaf8969
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bhrigu K. Lahkar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Antoine Muller  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Raphaël Dumas  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lionel Reveret  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Thomas Robert  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Accuracy of a markerless motion capture system in estimating upper extremity kinematics during boxing 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2624-9367 
500 |a 10.3389/fspor.2022.939980 
520 |a Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity can be useful to assess the performance and skill levels of athletes during combat sports such as boxing. Although marker-based approach is widely used to obtain kinematic data, it is not suitable for "in the field" activities, i.e., when performed outside the laboratory environment. Markerless video-based systems along with deep learning-based pose estimation algorithms show great potential for estimating skeletal kinematics. However, applicability of these systems in assessing upper-limb kinematics remains unexplored in highly dynamic activities. This study aimed to assess kinematics of the upper limb estimated with a markerless motion capture system (2D video cameras along with commercially available pose estimation software Theia3D) compared to those measured with marker-based system during "in the field" boxing. A total of three elite boxers equipped with retroreflective markers were instructed to perform specific sequences of shadow boxing trials. Their movements were simultaneously recorded with 12 optoelectronic and 10 video cameras, providing synchronized data to be processed further for comparison. Comparative assessment showed higher differences in 3D joint center positions at the elbow (more than 3 cm) compared to the shoulder and wrist (<2.5 cm). In the case of joint angles, relatively weaker agreement was observed along internal/external rotation. The shoulder joint revealed better performance across all the joints. Segment velocities displayed good-to-excellent agreement across all the segments. Overall, segment velocities exhibited better performance compared to joint angles. The findings indicate that, given the practicality of markerless motion capture system, it can be a promising alternative to analyze sports-performance. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a markerless vs. marker-based 
690 |a kinematic analysis 
690 |a evaluation 
690 |a elite sport 
690 |a upper-limb 
690 |a sports-performance 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, Vol 4 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2022.939980/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2624-9367 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1d9236e5579a40a19af9f91e8aaf8969  |z Connect to this object online.