Sex differences in frequencies of dermatoglyphic patterns by individual fingers

Background: The size of sex differences in dermatoglyphic features and their inter-population differences remains a subject of debate. Combining fingers in traditional dermatoglyphic methodology and omitting finger-specific variations might be a cause for uncertainty. Aim: To compare sex differences...

Full beskrivning

Sparad:
Bibliografiska uppgifter
Huvudupphovsmän: Miroslav Králík (Författare, medförfattare), Lenka Polcerová (Författare, medförfattare), Martin Čuta (Författare, medförfattare)
Materialtyp: Bok
Publicerad: Taylor & Francis Group, 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Ämnen:
Länkar:Connect to this object online.
Taggar: Lägg till en tagg
Inga taggar, Lägg till första taggen!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1de94b130bfc4f7d9f70a10d98cee8fb
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Miroslav Králík  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lenka Polcerová  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Martin Čuta  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Sex differences in frequencies of dermatoglyphic patterns by individual fingers 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0301-4460 
500 |a 1464-5033 
500 |a 10.1080/03014460.2019.1622778 
520 |a Background: The size of sex differences in dermatoglyphic features and their inter-population differences remains a subject of debate. Combining fingers in traditional dermatoglyphic methodology and omitting finger-specific variations might be a cause for uncertainty. Aim: To compare sex differences in whorl frequencies between fingers. Subjects and methods: Using meta-analytical methods, the authors studied sex differences in frequencies of whorls (log Odd Ratios) for each finger separately, including their heterogeneities (between-samples variance). The dataset of 204 population samples was extracted from published dermatoglyphic studies. Results: Aggregated effects of sex differences were significant in all fingers, except for the left 1st finger. Sex differences were higher in the right hand and increased from radial to ulnar fingers. Apart from the right 1st and 3rd fingers, heterogeneities were small and literally zero in the right 4th finger. Conclusion: Higher sex differences in ulnar fingers and the lack of interpopulation differences all over the world in the 4th finger might be caused by a stronger influence of genetic and/or hormonal factors on dermatoglyphic development of the ulnar side of the hand. It is suggested that future studies, when applying dermatoglyphic traits as markers of prenatal environment, use traits by individual fingers or their relationships within the hand. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a dermatoglyphics 
690 |a sex differences 
690 |a prenatal programming 
690 |a interpopulation differences 
690 |a meta-analysis 
690 |a Biology (General) 
690 |a QH301-705.5 
690 |a Human anatomy 
690 |a QM1-695 
690 |a Physiology 
690 |a QP1-981 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Annals of Human Biology, Vol 46, Iss 3, Pp 231-245 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2019.1622778 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0301-4460 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1464-5033 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1de94b130bfc4f7d9f70a10d98cee8fb  |z Connect to this object online.