Prevalence of tooth mortality among adults in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tooth loss remains a significant deterrent to oral health and adversely affects the dietary intake and nutritional status of individuals compromising their general health. It is a debilitating and irreversible condition and is considered as the "final marker of disease burden for oral health.&q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malliga Venkat (Author), Chandrashekar Janakiram (Author), Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1e8d49c636a14a108a0be5af266b3e3d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Malliga Venkat  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chandrashekar Janakiram  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Prevalence of tooth mortality among adults in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0976-237X 
500 |a 0976-2361 
500 |a 10.4103/ccd.ccd_787_20 
520 |a Tooth loss remains a significant deterrent to oral health and adversely affects the dietary intake and nutritional status of individuals compromising their general health. It is a debilitating and irreversible condition and is considered as the "final marker of disease burden for oral health." The prevalence of tooth mortality and its causes has been studied for many years through point prevalence studies; however, there is a need to generate a national representative data. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature measuring the prevalence of tooth mortality in India. We searched the following databases for studies that had assessed the prevalence of tooth mortality in India: PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, and Scopus. This yielded 36 studies, of which 16 eligible cross-sectional studies assessing the prevalence among those 18 years and above were included. Meta-analyses using the random-effects model were conducted for tooth mortality outcomes which stratified for different covariates such as age groups, gender, geographic region, population group, type of index, and reason for loss using MetaXL Version 5.3 Software, Netherlands developed by Dr Jan J Barendregt. Pooled prevalence was used to estimate the overall effect, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 13,662 adults participated in the 16 studies. We found that the overall prevalence of complete tooth mortality (loss of 32 teeth) was 10.7% (95% CI: 10.2%-11.2%, 16 studies, n = 2249) and partial tooth mortality (having one or more teeth) was 58.8% (95% CI: 57.9%-59.6%, 16 studies, n = 7526). Rural area adults showed twice 61% (60.5%, 95% CI: 58.9-62.1, 7 studies) than urban adults. Females had higher partial tooth mortality (48.2%%), whereas males higher complete tooth mortality (20.2%). There was higher methodological heterogeneity of included studies. Nearly 35% of adults have complete or partial tooth mortality. Greater tooth mortality indicates the burden of the prosthetic needs. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a edentulousness 
690 |a prevalence 
690 |a tooth mortality 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 339-345 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2021;volume=12;issue=4;spage=339;epage=345;aulast=Venkat 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-237X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-2361 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1e8d49c636a14a108a0be5af266b3e3d  |z Connect to this object online.