Robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis: Initial experience in a single institution

Objective: To assess surgical outcomes for robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis in a single institution. Materials and Methods: Between March 2009 and January 2010, 10 patients underwent robot-assisted tubal ligation reversal (TLR) with a da Vinci S surgical system. Patient demographic data, including...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Ahmet Göçmen (Автор), Fatih Şanlıkan (Автор), Mustafa Gazi Uçar (Автор)
Формат:
Опубликовано: Elsevier, 2013-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Предметы:
Online-ссылка:Connect to this object online.
Метки: Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1ef470b76fd64e39b4d90c7cd4934a79
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ahmet Göçmen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fatih Şanlıkan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mustafa Gazi Uçar  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis: Initial experience in a single institution 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2013-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1028-4559 
500 |a 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.036 
520 |a Objective: To assess surgical outcomes for robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis in a single institution. Materials and Methods: Between March 2009 and January 2010, 10 patients underwent robot-assisted tubal ligation reversal (TLR) with a da Vinci S surgical system. Patient demographic data, including operative times, operative and postoperative complications, hospital stay, conversion to laparotomy and pregnancy rates were recorded. Results: Mean age and body mass index for the patients were 37.7 (35-42) years and 28.9 (23.9-36.3) kg/m2, respectively. The mean console time was 102.5 min and the mean total operation time was 130.6 (102-164) min. The mean hospital stay was 1.2 (1-2) days. There were no significant intra-operative or early-postoperative complications. All surgeries were completed robotically with no conversion to laparotomy. There were seven subsequent pregnancies in the study participants, representing a pregnancy rate of 70%, of which five were intrauterine pregnancies, one was an ectopic pregnancy, and one was an abortus. Conclusion: Robot-assisted TLR is safe and feasible. This procedure may facilitate minimally invasive treatment for patients who want to regain their fertility without the aid of artificial reproductive techniques. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a robotic tubal ligation reversal 
690 |a tubal reanastomosis 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol 52, Iss 1, Pp 77-80 (2013) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455913000156 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1028-4559 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1ef470b76fd64e39b4d90c7cd4934a79  |z Connect to this object online.