Comparative situational analysis of comprehensive abortion care in four Southern African countries

We report on a comparative situational analysis of comprehensive abortion care (CAC) in Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho and Namibia. We conducted systematic literature searches and country consultations and used a reparative health justice approach (with four dimensions) for the analysis. The following...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catriona Ida Macleod (Author), Megan Reuvers (Author), John Hunter Reynolds (Author), Antonella Lavelanet (Author), Richard Delate (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1f17fb1b4fe04cd9aba0e7031c8a0248
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Catriona Ida Macleod  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Megan Reuvers  |e author 
700 1 0 |a John Hunter Reynolds  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Antonella Lavelanet  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Richard Delate  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparative situational analysis of comprehensive abortion care in four Southern African countries 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1744-1692 
500 |a 1744-1706 
500 |a 10.1080/17441692.2023.2217442 
520 |a We report on a comparative situational analysis of comprehensive abortion care (CAC) in Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho and Namibia. We conducted systematic literature searches and country consultations and used a reparative health justice approach (with four dimensions) for the analysis. The following findings pertain to all four countries, except where indicated. Individual material dimension: pervasive gender-based violence (GBV); unmet need for contraception (15−17%); high HIV prevalence; poor abortion access for rape survivors; fees for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services (Eswatini). Collective material dimension: no clear national budgeting for SRH; over-reliance on donor funding (Eswatini; Lesotho); no national CAC guidelines or guidance on legal abortion access; poor data collection and management systems; shortage and inequitable distribution of staff; few facilities providing abortion care. Individual symbolic dimension: gender norms justify GBV; stigma attached to both abortion and unwed or early pregnancies. Collective symbolic dimension: policy commitments to reducing unsafe abortion and to post-abortion care, but not to increasing access to legal abortion; inadequate research; contradictions in abortion legislation (Botswana); inadequate staff training in CAC. Political will to ensure CAC within the country's legislation is required. Reparative health justice comparisons provide a powerful tool for foregrounding necessary policy and practice change. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a abortion 
690 |a post-abortion care 
690 |a southern africa 
690 |a reproductive justice 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Global Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 1 (2023) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2023.2217442 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1744-1692 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1744-1706 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1f17fb1b4fe04cd9aba0e7031c8a0248  |z Connect to this object online.