Comparative situational analysis of comprehensive abortion care in four Southern African countries
We report on a comparative situational analysis of comprehensive abortion care (CAC) in Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho and Namibia. We conducted systematic literature searches and country consultations and used a reparative health justice approach (with four dimensions) for the analysis. The following...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group,
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_1f17fb1b4fe04cd9aba0e7031c8a0248 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Catriona Ida Macleod |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Megan Reuvers |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a John Hunter Reynolds |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Antonella Lavelanet |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Richard Delate |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Comparative situational analysis of comprehensive abortion care in four Southern African countries |
260 | |b Taylor & Francis Group, |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 1744-1692 | ||
500 | |a 1744-1706 | ||
500 | |a 10.1080/17441692.2023.2217442 | ||
520 | |a We report on a comparative situational analysis of comprehensive abortion care (CAC) in Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho and Namibia. We conducted systematic literature searches and country consultations and used a reparative health justice approach (with four dimensions) for the analysis. The following findings pertain to all four countries, except where indicated. Individual material dimension: pervasive gender-based violence (GBV); unmet need for contraception (15−17%); high HIV prevalence; poor abortion access for rape survivors; fees for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services (Eswatini). Collective material dimension: no clear national budgeting for SRH; over-reliance on donor funding (Eswatini; Lesotho); no national CAC guidelines or guidance on legal abortion access; poor data collection and management systems; shortage and inequitable distribution of staff; few facilities providing abortion care. Individual symbolic dimension: gender norms justify GBV; stigma attached to both abortion and unwed or early pregnancies. Collective symbolic dimension: policy commitments to reducing unsafe abortion and to post-abortion care, but not to increasing access to legal abortion; inadequate research; contradictions in abortion legislation (Botswana); inadequate staff training in CAC. Political will to ensure CAC within the country's legislation is required. Reparative health justice comparisons provide a powerful tool for foregrounding necessary policy and practice change. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a abortion | ||
690 | |a post-abortion care | ||
690 | |a southern africa | ||
690 | |a reproductive justice | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Global Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 1 (2023) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2023.2217442 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1744-1692 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1744-1706 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/1f17fb1b4fe04cd9aba0e7031c8a0248 |z Connect to this object online. |