Developmentalism: An Obscure but Pervasive Restriction

Despite continuing criticism of public education, experimentally demonstrated and field tested teaching methods have been ignored, rejected, and abandoned. Instead of a stable consensus regarding best teaching practices, there seems only an unending succession of innovations. A longstanding educatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. E. Stone (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Arizona State University, 1996-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1f9af0fde5b942c0917536d157fbf14f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a J. E. Stone  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Developmentalism: An Obscure but Pervasive Restriction 
260 |b Arizona State University,   |c 1996-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1068-2341 
520 |a Despite continuing criticism of public education, experimentally demonstrated and field tested teaching methods have been ignored, rejected, and abandoned. Instead of a stable consensus regarding best teaching practices, there seems only an unending succession of innovations. A longstanding educational doctrine appears to underlie this anomalous state of affairs. Termed developmentalism, it presumes "natural" ontogenesis to be optimal and it requires experimentally demonstrated teaching practices to overcome a presumption that they interfere with an optimal developmental trajectory. It also discourages teachers and parents from asserting themselves with children. Instead of effective interventions, it seeks the preservation of a postulated natural perfection. Developmentalism's rich history is expressed in a literature extending over 400 years. Its notable exponents include Jean Jacques Rousseau, John Dewey, and Jean Piaget; and its most recent expressions include "developmentally appropriate practice" and "constructivism." In the years during which it gained ascendance, developmentalism served as a basis for rejecting harsh and inhumane teaching methods. Today it impedes efforts to hold schools accountable for student academic achievement. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 4, p 8 (1996) 
787 0 |n http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/631 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1f9af0fde5b942c0917536d157fbf14f  |z Connect to this object online.