Effect of cantilever length on stress distribution around implants in overdentures supported by two implants

Introduction: Reducing stress on implats in overdentures supported by two implants via optimal stress distribution is nessecery. The aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution pattern around implants in overdentures supported by two impalnts with varying cantilever lengths using finite el...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramin Mosharraf (Author), Behnaz Ebadian (Author), Nilofar Khodaeian (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2151e7a3826d4fefb469926ec4ffdb5d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ramin Mosharraf  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Behnaz Ebadian  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nilofar Khodaeian  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effect of cantilever length on stress distribution around implants in overdentures supported by two implants 
260 |b Isfahan University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1735-255X 
500 |a 2008-6989 
520 |a Introduction: Reducing stress on implats in overdentures supported by two implants via optimal stress distribution is nessecery. The aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution pattern around implants in overdentures supported by two impalnts with varying cantilever lengths using finite element analysis.Materials and Methods: The model used in this experimental-analytical study was an implant-supported overdenture with bar and clip attachment system on an edentulous mandibular arch. Two vertical impalnts with cantilever lengths of 0 mm, 7 mm, and 13 mm were connected by a bar. Vertical loads of 15 and 30 pounds were applied unilaterally to the first molar and 15 pounds to the first premolar; the stress in bone was analyzed by finite element method.Results: In the 7-mm and 13-mm cantilever models loaded by 15 Ib on the molar area, the stress values around the implants were 2.78 and 2.75 MP, respectively, compared to 3.06 MP in the model without cantilever. By loading a 30-Ib force in the molar area, stress values around the implants were 6.9, 6.42 and 6.28 MP in no cantilever, 7-mm and 13-mm cantilever models, respectively. No uniform pattern of stress distribution was seen by increasing the cantilever length; however, increasing cantilever length did not increase stress around the ipsilaleral implant.Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, increasing cantilever length did not increase stress values, especially around the ipsilateral implants and it may be helpful to use cantilevers in cases of mandibular overdentures supported by splinted implants with insufficient retention and stability. Based on the findings of this study, optimal cantilever length in mandibular overdentures cannot be determined. Key words: Biomechanics, Computerized simulation, Dental implant, Finite element analysis, Overdenture, Stress analysis methods. 
546 |a FA 
690 |a Key words: Biomechanics 
690 |a Computerized simulation 
690 |a Dental implant 
690 |a Finite element analysis 
690 |a Overdenture 
690 |a Stress analysis methods 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان, Vol 7, Iss 2, Pp 178-186 (2011) 
787 0 |n http://jids.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jids/article/view/332 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1735-255X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2008-6989 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2151e7a3826d4fefb469926ec4ffdb5d  |z Connect to this object online.