A comparative evaluation of four restorative materials to support undermined occlusal enamel of permanent teeth
The purpose of this study was to test the support to undermined occlusal enamel provided by posterior restorative composite (FiltekTM P60, 3M Dental products USA), polyacid modified resin composite (F2000 compomer, 3M Dental products, USA.), radiopaque silver alloy-glass ionomer cement (Miracle Mix....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Prabhakar A (Author), Thejokrishna P (Author), Kurthukoti A (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2006-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Permanent Molars with Undermined Walls Restored With Different Materials and Techniques
by: Zahra Mohammadzadeh, et al.
Published: (2021) -
A comparison of impact strength of fragment-bonded anterior teeth using three different restorative materials: An <i>in vitro</i> study
by: Prabhakar A, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Mapping of proximal enamel thickness in permanent teeth
by: Flávio Vellini Ferreira, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated permanent anterior teeth restored with three different esthetic post systems: An in vitro study
by: Ameet J Kurthukoti, et al.
Published: (2015) -
COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUPERFICIAL LAYER MORPHOLOGY OF PERMANENT TEETH ENAMEL AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF MINERALIZATION
by: G. Sorochenko
Published: (2016)