AGREEMENT BETWEEN PHYSICAL BEST AND FITNESSGRAM CRITERION-REFERENCED STANDARDS FOR MUSCULAR STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE

ABSTRACT Objective: To verify the agreement between PHYSICAL BEST and FITNESSGRAM health-related criteria for muscle strength and endurance. Methods: This agreement study had a sample of 81 children and adolescents. Participants were submitted to the PHYSICAL BEST (Sit-up and Pull-up) and FITNESSGRA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gustavo Aires de Arruda (Author), Diogo Henrique Constantino Coledam (Author), Francys Paula Cantieri (Author), Arli Ramos de Oliveira (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo, 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_222b3cf6e5ea4033a5e2d85ac8edceae
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Gustavo Aires de Arruda  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Diogo Henrique Constantino Coledam  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Francys Paula Cantieri  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Arli Ramos de Oliveira  |e author 
245 0 0 |a AGREEMENT BETWEEN PHYSICAL BEST AND FITNESSGRAM CRITERION-REFERENCED STANDARDS FOR MUSCULAR STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE 
260 |b Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo,   |c 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1984-0462 
500 |a 10.1590/1984-0462/2021/39/2020018 
520 |a ABSTRACT Objective: To verify the agreement between PHYSICAL BEST and FITNESSGRAM health-related criteria for muscle strength and endurance. Methods: This agreement study had a sample of 81 children and adolescents. Participants were submitted to the PHYSICAL BEST (Sit-up and Pull-up) and FITNESSGRAM (Curl-up and Modified Pull-up) test batteries. Additionally, FITNESSGRAM also proposed criteria for Pull-up test. Results of tests were classified in accordance with their respective criteria. Each group had an interval of seven days between the first and second battery of tests. Statistical analysis used the Kappa index (p<0.05). Results: Sit-up and Curl-up tests among the boys agreed in 72.2% (Kappa=0.368; p=0.004) of cases, and for the girls, in 64.4% (Kappa=0.130; p=0.076). Pull-up (PHYSICAL BEST versus FITNESSGRAM) agreed in 83.3% (Kappa=0.599; p<0.001) for boys. The agreement between Pull-up and Modified Pull-up (PHYSICAL BEST versus FITNESSGRAM) for boys was 47.2% (Kappa=0.071; p=0.533), and for girls, 44.5% (Kappa=0.102; p=0.120). The agreement between the Pull-up and Modified Pull-up tests (FITNESSGRAM) for boys was 58.4% (Kappa=0.215; p=0.143), and for girls, 44.5% (Kappa=0.102; p=0.120). Conclusions: For individual analysis over time, as well as for the comparison of passing rates between different populations, caution is advised when using different criterion-referenced standards for strength and endurance, particularly if using different tests. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Physical fitness 
690 |a Reference standards 
690 |a Health 
690 |a Child 
690 |a Adolescent 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a RJ1-570 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Paulista de Pediatria, Vol 39 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-05822021000100464&tlng=pt 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-05822021000100464&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1984-0462 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/222b3cf6e5ea4033a5e2d85ac8edceae  |z Connect to this object online.