Statistical approach for selection of regression model during validation of bioanalytical method

• Main Authors: Natalija Nakov (Author), Jasmina Tonic-Ribarska (Author), Aneta Dimitrovska (Author), Rumenka Petkovska (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: University Ss Cyril and Methodius in Skopje, Faculty of Pharmacy and Macedonian Pharmaceutical Association, 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 1409-8695; 1857-8969
• Keywords: Pharmacy and materia medica; RS1-441
• Source: Makedonsko Farmacevtski Bilten, Vol 60, Iss (1), Pp 19-25 (2014)

The selection of an adequate regression model is the basis for obtaining accurate and reproducible results during the bionalytical method validation. Given the wide concentration range, frequently present in bioanalytical assays, heteroscedasticity of the data may be expected. Several weighted linear and quadratic regression models were evaluated during the selection of the adequate curve fit using nonparametric statistical tests: One sample rank test and Wilcoxon signed rank test for two independent groups of samples. The results obtained with One sample rank test could not give statistical justification for the selection of linear vs. quadratic regression models because slight differences between the error (presented through the relative residuals) were obtained. Estimation of the significance of the differences in the RR was achieved using Wilcoxon signed rank test, where linear and quadratic regression models were treated as two independent groups. The application of this simple non-parametric statistical test provides statistical confirmation of the choice of an adequate regression model.