Water sorption and solubility of polyamide denture base materials

Purpose: Some patients experience adverse reactions to poly(methyl methacrylate)-based (PMMA) dentures. Polyamide (PA) as an alternative to PMMA has, however, not been well documented with regard to water sorption and water solubility. The aim of this in vitro study was to measure water sorption and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Long G. Nguyen (Author), Hilde M. Kopperud (Author), Marit Øilo (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_23b045e030bd4cba905a050a1e9df393
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Long G. Nguyen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hilde M. Kopperud  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marit Øilo  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Water sorption and solubility of polyamide denture base materials 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2333-7931 
500 |a 10.1080/23337931.2017.1326009 
520 |a Purpose: Some patients experience adverse reactions to poly(methyl methacrylate)-based (PMMA) dentures. Polyamide (PA) as an alternative to PMMA has, however, not been well documented with regard to water sorption and water solubility. The aim of this in vitro study was to measure water sorption and water solubility of two PA materials compared with PMMA, and to evaluate the major components released from the PA materials and the effect on hardness of the materials. Methods: Ten discs (40.0 mm diameter, 2.0 mm thick) of each material (PA: Valplast and Breflex; PMMA: SR Ivocap HIP) were prepared according to manufacturers' recommendations. The specimens were tested for water sorption and water solubility, according to a modification of ISO 20795-1:2008. Released substances were analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Results: There were statistically significant differences among the materials regarding water sorption, water solubility and time to water saturation. Breflex had the highest water sorption (30.4 μg/mm3), followed by PMMA-material (25.8 μg/mm3) and Valplast (13.6 μg/mm3). Both PA materials had statistically significant lower water solubility than the PMMA. Both PA had a net increase in weight. Analysis by GC/MS identified release of the compound 12-aminododecanolactam from the material Valplast. No release was found from the Breflex material. Conclusions: The PA denture materials show differences in water sorption and solubility, but within the limits of the standard requirements. The PA showed a net increase in weight after long-term water sorption. The clinical implications of the findings are not elucidated. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Denture base materials 
690 |a nylon 
690 |a polyamide 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 47-52 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1326009 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2333-7931 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/23b045e030bd4cba905a050a1e9df393  |z Connect to this object online.