Evaluation of the amount of residual monomer released from different flowable composite resins

Abstract Today, resin materials are used in the restoration of permanent and deciduous teeth or as fissure sealants. The materials can contain different types of monomers (Bis-GMA, UDMA, TEGDMA). These monomers can be released into the oral cavity after polymerization. Residual monomers released fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Didem Odabasi (Author), Cigdem Guler (Author), Didem Kucukaslan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2024-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_23df785c3e9c47d9bc5ed47fe0fb43f5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Didem Odabasi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cigdem Guler  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Didem Kucukaslan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of the amount of residual monomer released from different flowable composite resins 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2024-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12903-024-04005-2 
500 |a 1472-6831 
520 |a Abstract Today, resin materials are used in the restoration of permanent and deciduous teeth or as fissure sealants. The materials can contain different types of monomers (Bis-GMA, UDMA, TEGDMA). These monomers can be released into the oral cavity after polymerization. Residual monomers released from resin-containing restorative materials after polymerization have been reported to have negative effects on mechanical properties. The aim of our study is to evaluate the amount of residual monomers released after polymerization of different flowable composite resin materials using two different modes of LED light source. Composite disc samples (8 mm diameter/2 mm depth) prepared for each material group were polymerized using two different modes of the LED light device (Standard mode and extra power mode). HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) device was used to measure the amount of residual monomer release at 1 h, 1 day, 3 days and 7 days periods. Pairwise comparison of the differences between the materials was performed by Post-hoc test. For each residual monomer, the Kruskal Wallis test was used to analyze the difference between the materials in standard mode and the difference between the materials in extra power mode. According to the results of the study; Grandio flow flowable composite showed the highest release of TEGDMA and Bis-GMA while SDR® Flow flowable composite showed the lowest release of TEGDMA, Bis-GMA and UDMA. For all materials, the extra power mode resulted in more residual monomer release. TEGDMA and Bis-GMA release was detected in all tested flowable composites at all time periods. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Flowable composite 
690 |a HPLC 
690 |a Polymerization mode 
690 |a Residual monomer 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Oral Health, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04005-2 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6831 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/23df785c3e9c47d9bc5ed47fe0fb43f5  |z Connect to this object online.