Effects of Slow Deep Breathing on Acute Clinical Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Slow deep breathing (SDB) may help patients with acute pain. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the effects of SDB on acute pain. Secondary aims include investigating the effects of SDB on acute pain-related physical and emotional functioning. An a priori p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amira E. Joseph MD (Author), Rajat N. Moman MD, MA (Author), Ross A. Barman DO (Author), Donald J. Kleppel MD (Author), Nathan D. Eberhart (Author), Danielle J. Gerberi MLIS (Author), M. Hassan Murad MD (Author), W. Michael Hooten MD (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_249d94c9af8045e6b223691e918ae451
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Amira E. Joseph MD  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rajat N. Moman MD, MA  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ross A. Barman DO  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Donald J. Kleppel MD  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nathan D. Eberhart  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Danielle J. Gerberi MLIS  |e author 
700 1 0 |a M. Hassan Murad MD  |e author 
700 1 0 |a W. Michael Hooten MD  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effects of Slow Deep Breathing on Acute Clinical Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2515-690X 
500 |a 10.1177/2515690X221078006 
520 |a Slow deep breathing (SDB) may help patients with acute pain. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the effects of SDB on acute pain. Secondary aims include investigating the effects of SDB on acute pain-related physical and emotional functioning. An a priori protocol was registered and a database search was conducted by a reference librarian. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were eligible for inclusion and exclusion criteria included studies of SDB for non-pain indications and studies that applied SDB as a component of an encompassing intervention. The risk or bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model. A total of 11 968 studies were screened and seven RCTs met inclusion criteria; five were judged to have low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of post-intervention pain scores demonstrated that SDB was associated with significantly lower pain scores compared with a control group, but with high levels of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyzes demonstrated that trials of burn pain were associated with a larger reduction in pain which partially explains the heterogeneity. Very low certainty evidence suggests that SDB may reduce acute pain intensity. Further research is needed to identify patients who are candidates for SDB and determine the best approach to deliver this therapy. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Other systems of medicine 
690 |a RZ201-999 
690 |a Homeopathy 
690 |a RX1-681 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine, Vol 27 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690X221078006 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2515-690X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/249d94c9af8045e6b223691e918ae451  |z Connect to this object online.