Comparison of the Anaerobic Power of Brazilian Professional Football Players Grouped by Tactical Position

Football is characterized as a predominately aerobic modality, however, during a match; the most important actions performed by the players are in short duration and high intensity. In addition, this sport presents to have some particularities, such as, highlights differences of each tactical positi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renan Renato Cruz dos Santos (Author), Caio Victor de Sousa (Author), Rafael Reis Olher (Author), Ivo Vieira de Sousa Neto (Author), Lilian Alves Pereira (Author), Marcelo Magalhães Sales (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Montenegrin Sports Academy, 2014-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_264f0ec1405f47fbb7bf6c785f770f3d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Renan Renato Cruz dos Santos   |e author 
700 1 0 |a Caio Victor de Sousa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rafael Reis Olher  |e author 
700 1 0 |a  Ivo Vieira de Sousa Neto  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lilian Alves Pereira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marcelo Magalhães Sales   |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of the Anaerobic Power of Brazilian Professional Football Players Grouped by Tactical Position 
260 |b Montenegrin Sports Academy,   |c 2014-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1800-8755 
500 |a 1800-8763 
520 |a Football is characterized as a predominately aerobic modality, however, during a match; the most important actions performed by the players are in short duration and high intensity. In addition, this sport presents to have some particularities, such as, highlights differences of each tactical position. Thus, this study aimed to compare the anaerobic power of professional football players grouped by different tactical positions. Thirty professional football players separated in three groups, goal¬keep¬ers+fullbacks, sideways+DMF (defensive middlefields) and OMF (offensive middlefields)+forwards, performed two anaerobic po¬wer tests, Running anaerobic sprint test and Sargent jump test Goalkeepers+fullbacks showed higher values of body mass index and absolute anaerobic power (w), using Sargent jump test than the others, but when analyzed the RAST results, this same group presented lower values (p<0.05) of relative AP (w∙kg-1). OMF+forwards showed to have the best Pmed and Pmax values (p<0.05), when compared with defensive players. These results suggest the use of running anaerobic sprint test and sargent jump test toge¬ther when is proposed to measure the anaerobic power of football players, and also a anthropometric evaluation, so the training can be more specific e efficient to each tactical position and athlete. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Anaerobic power 
690 |a Sprint test 
690 |a Football 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 13-17 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.mjssm.me/clanci/MJSSM_Sept_2014_dos_Santos_13-17.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1800-8755 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1800-8763 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/264f0ec1405f47fbb7bf6c785f770f3d  |z Connect to this object online.