Management of high-risk patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in Germany: differences between cardiac specialists in the inpatient and outpatient setting

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Among patients with hypertension, those with established left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) represent a high risk cohort with poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate differences in characteristics and health care management of such p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wegscheider Karl (Author), Thiery Joachim (Author), Sonntag Frank J (Author), Völler Heinz (Author), Luft Friedrich C (Author), Bestehorn Kurt (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2006-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_269b6805c0e84f6e9c8fc13d96521a8f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Wegscheider Karl  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Thiery Joachim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sonntag Frank J  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Völler Heinz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Luft Friedrich C  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bestehorn Kurt  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Management of high-risk patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in Germany: differences between cardiac specialists in the inpatient and outpatient setting 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2006-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/1471-2458-6-256 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Among patients with hypertension, those with established left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) represent a high risk cohort with poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate differences in characteristics and health care management of such patients treated as inpatients or outpatients by cardiac specialists.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Prospective cross-sectional study in patients with hypertension and LVH who were referred to either inpatient care (rehabilitation hospitals) or to outpatient care (cardiology practices).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 6358 inpatients (59.6% males; mean age 66.6 years) and 2246 outpatients (59.5% males; mean age 63.2 years) were followed up for a mean of 23 vs. 52 days, respectively. Inpatients compared to outpatients had a significantly higher prevalence of coronary heart disease, history of stroke, renal failure or diabetes. Mean blood pressure of inpatients compared to outpatients was significantly lower both at entry (150/84 vs. 161/93 mmHg) and at end of follow-up (129/75 vs. 139/83 mmHg). After adjustment for baseline blood pressure and a propensity score, differences between out- and inpatients at end of follow-up were 8.0/5.1 mmHg in favour of inpatients. Blood pressure goals as specified by guidelines were not met by 32% of inpatients and 55% of outpatients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Inpatients had a higher rate of comorbidities and more advanced atherosclerotic disease than outpatients. Control of hypertension of inpatients was already better on admission than in outpatients, and treatment intensity in this group was also higher during the observation period. While blood pressure lowering was substantial in both groups, there were still a high proportion of patients who did not achieve treatment goals at discharge.</p> 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 6, Iss 1, p 256 (2006) 
787 0 |n http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/256 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/269b6805c0e84f6e9c8fc13d96521a8f  |z Connect to this object online.