Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract Background Despite all the evidence corroborating the selective use of episiotomy and although routine use of the procedure is contraindicated, there are no evidences corroborating if episiotomy is necessary in any circumstance. The present clinical randomized trial was performed to compare...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | M. M. Amorim (Author), Isabela Cristina Coutinho (Author), Inês Melo (Author), Leila Katz (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2017-04-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Correction to: Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial
by: Melania M. Amorim, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Brazilian Obstetricians Regarding Episiotomy
by: Carolina Maria Pires Cunha, et al.
Published: (2019) -
The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial
by: Roeland Odijk, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Episiotomy - the present scenario
by: Prof (Dr)
Published: (2023) -
Third and Fourth Degree Perineal Lacerations of Episiotomy Versus Non-Episiotomy in Spontaneous Vaginal Deliveries at Phramongkutklao Hospital
by: Chakpan Supadech, et al.
Published: (2008)