COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) VERSUS ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPHY (OPG), A PRIORITY OR A NECESSITY IN ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY: A REVIEW

Aim of the study: To compare orthopantomography (OPG) with computed tomography (CT) to analyze the relative advantages, disadvantages and necessity of these modalities. Material and methods: Supported by narrative rewiew, we evaluated the necessity of CT and OPG in oral implantology practice. Result...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Budau Corina (Author), Filipescu Elena-Cristina (Author), Popescu Corina (Author), Raicu Camelia (Author), Vîrtos Irina (Author), Șuba Arina (Author), Forna Norina Consuela (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Romanian Dental Association for Education, 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim of the study: To compare orthopantomography (OPG) with computed tomography (CT) to analyze the relative advantages, disadvantages and necessity of these modalities. Material and methods: Supported by narrative rewiew, we evaluated the necessity of CT and OPG in oral implantology practice. Results: The analysis shows that CT preference was greater for implant planning in comparison to OPG. Conclusions: The overall results suggested that CT has priority in assessing the parameters of implant site when compared to OPG.
Item Description:2393-1108
2393-1531