Development and psychometric evaluation of an emotional growth questionnaire for university students
Background: Despite the importance of emotional growth promotion among students, there is still a lack of standard emotional growth tools to evaluate the concept while developing interventional programs. The aim of present study was to devise and provide a valid and reliable instrument for measuring...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,
2018-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_298a0d46c68b44bb819f8fc00a6af19a | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Fatemeh Rostami |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jamileh Mokhtari Nouri |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Abbas Ebadi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Morteza Khaghanizade |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Development and psychometric evaluation of an emotional growth questionnaire for university students |
260 | |b Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, |c 2018-10-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2228-6497 | ||
500 | |a 10.15171/hpp.2018.43 | ||
520 | |a Background: Despite the importance of emotional growth promotion among students, there is still a lack of standard emotional growth tools to evaluate the concept while developing interventional programs. The aim of present study was to devise and provide a valid and reliable instrument for measuring students' emotional growth.Methods: This study was conducted from 2016 to 2017 among university students. A questionnaire containing 79 items was made using focus group discussions with students and studying relevant texts. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 188) was used to determine the construct validity of the questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 38) was performed to assess the validity of the model. Reliability (n = 56) and repeatability (n = 31) of the questionnaire were assessed.Results: A 4-factor (positive identity, self-esteem, effective communication and motivation)and 21-item solution was found as the best solution, which explained 63.5% of total variancebetween the items. The results of CFA approved the validity of the model (CFI = 0.914, RMSEA= 0.070). Cronbach alpha (0.93) and Intra class correlation coefficient (0.91) approved the reliability and repeatability of questionnaire.Conclusion: The 21 items questionnaire seems to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure emotional growth among university students. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Emotional growth | ||
690 | |a Reliability | ||
690 | |a Validity | ||
690 | |a Psychometric | ||
690 | |a Confirmatory factor analysis | ||
690 | |a Exploratory factor analysis | ||
690 | |a Nutrition. Foods and food supply | ||
690 | |a TX341-641 | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Health Promotion Perspectives, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp 303-307 (2018) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://hpp.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/hpp-8-303.pdf | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2228-6497 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/298a0d46c68b44bb819f8fc00a6af19a |z Connect to this object online. |