Cover Image

A comparative evaluation of microleakage among newer composite materials: An in vitro Study

Background: Good adhesive bonding of restorative materials to cavity walls minimizing microleakage is an important criterion for the performance and longevity of a restoration in the oral cavity. The present study is aimed to compare the microleakage among newer composite materials. Materials and Me...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Sruthi Keerthi Sudhapalli (Author), Swathi Sudhapalli (Author), Rahul Anand Razdan (Author), Virendra Singh (Author), Abhilasha Bhasin (Author)
Format:	Book
Published:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:	article
Online Access:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Comparative evaluation of microleakage and hardness of newer posterior restorative materials
by: Anjali Sardana, et al.
Published: (2022)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage of newer generation dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study
by: Rani Somani, et al.
Published: (2016)

Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Two Newer Composite Resin Materials: An in Vitro Study
by: Akshata Patil, et al.
Published: (2021)

Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Newer Methacrylate-Based Dental Composite Materials: An In Vitro Study
by: Sreenath Narayanan, et al.
Published: (2022)

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Bioactive, Ormocer, and Conventional GIC Restorative Materials in Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study Microleakage of Three Restorative Materials
by: Khushboo Jain, et al.
Published: (2022)

Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of newer nanoposterior composite resins after immersion in food-simulating liquids
by: C Meena Kumari, et al.
Published: (2019)

A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations
by: Sujatha Gopal Sooraparaju, et al.
Published: (2014)

An evaluation of Microleakage of Posterior Composites
by: Mohammadi N, et al.
Published: (1999)

Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study
by: Madhura Pawar, et al.
Published: (2021)

In vitro evaluation of microleakage of a flowable composite in class V restorations
by: Cimello Daniela Thomazatti, et al.
Published: (2002)

Pulpal temperature rise: Evaluation after light activation of newer pulp-capping materials and resin composite
by: Jash Lakhani, et al.
Published: (2018)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study
by: Priyatama Meshram, et al.
Published: (2019)

A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials
by: Alpana Kumari, et al.
Published: (2022)

In vitro evaluation of different liners in microleakage of class II posterior composite restorations
by: Behnaz Esmaeili, et al.
Published: (2012)

An Evaluation of Different Materials for Surface Treatment on Microleakage of Repaired Composite Resin Restoration
by: Jabbar H Kammel, et al.
Published: (2009)

Relationship Between Operator Experience And In Vitro Microleakage of Different Composite Materials in Class II Restorations
by: Hatice Nihal Öztürk, et al.
Published: (2022)

Microleakage of Flowable Composite as Class I Restorative Materials
by: Makdad Chakmakchi, et al.
Published: (2022)

Evaluation of self-adhering composite microleakage compared with tow conventional adhesive systems
by: Azadeh Zakerzadeh, et al.
Published: (2020)

Gingival microleakage in class II composite restorations using different flowable composites as liner: an in vitro evaluation
by: Neda Lotfi, et al.
Published: (2015)

Evaluation of The Microleakage of Polyacid Modified Composite Compared to Hybrid Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary and Permanent Teeth Restoration (An in vitro study)
by: Ayat F AL-Shimmary, et al.
Published: (2019)

A comparative evaluation of microleakage of restorations using silorane-based dental composite and methacrylate-based dental composites in Class II cavities: An in vitro study
by: Jambai Sampath Kumar Sivakumar, et al.
Published: (2016)

Microleakage of class v cavities restored with flowable composite materials
by: Janković Ognjenka, et al.
Published: (2014)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage of composite restorations using fifth and seventh generations of adhesive systems
by: Mitra Tabari, et al.
Published: (2014)

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro study
by: Mahima S Jain, et al.
Published: (2024)

A comparative evaluation of gingival microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restoration with two different lining techniques: An in vitro study
by: Rachana Shishodia, et al.
Published: (2022)

In vitro comparative evaluation of microleakage of newly introduced Dyad Flow and total and self etch adhesives in class V resin composite restorations
by: Mann Navjot S., et al.
Published: (2016)

Newer signs in dermatology [2016-2020]
by: Anupam Das, et al.
Published: (2021)

The comparative evaluation of fracture resistance and microleakage in bonded amalgam, amalgam, and composite resins in primary molars
by: H S Vanishree, et al.
Published: (2015)

An Evaluation on the Effects of Flowable or Condensable Composites Application on Microleakage
by: N Mohammadi, et al.
Published: (2002)

Comparative evaluation on the effect of different cavity disinfectant nano gels; Chlorohexidine, Propolis, Liquorice versus Diode Laser in terms of composite microleakage (comparative in vitro study)
by: Maryam Mohamed ElMansy, et al.
Published: (2023)

In-vitro evaluation of microleakage of bioceramic root-end filling materials: A spectrophotometric study
by: Ravi Gupta, et al.
Published: (2021)

Effect of newer antioxidants on the bond strength of composite on bleached enamel
by: M Manoharan, et al.
Published: (2016)

Evaluating flexure properties, hardness, roughness and microleakage of high-strength injectable dental composite: an in vitro study
by: Rasha R. Basheer, et al.
Published: (2024)

Effect of Chlorhexidine on Microleakage of Composite
by: F. Darabi, et al.
Published: (2009)

Radiopacity and Microleakage Evaluation of Different Intermediate Materials
by: Gözde Açikgöz, et al.
Published: (2024)

The Effect of Occlusal Loading on Gingival Microleakage of Bulk Fill Composites Compared with a Conventional Composite
by: Razieh Hoseinifar, et al.
Published: (2020)

Marginal Microleakage of Low-shrinkage Composite Silorane in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study
by: Hamid Reza Poureslami, et al.
Published: (2012)

In Vitro Microleakage of Class V Composite Restorations in Use of Three Adhesive Systems
by: Fariba Motevaselian, et al.
Published: (2016)

IN VITRO STUDY OF DENTAL COMPOSITE ROUGHNESS AND MICROLEAKAGE OF REPAIRED OBTURATIONS BY VARIOUS TECHNIQUES
by: Radostina Anastasova, et al.
Published: (2019)

Evaluation of Apical Microleakage in Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Three Sealer Materials: An In Vitro Study
by: Biland M.S Shukri, et al.
Published: (2022)