Effectiveness of the bone ring technique and simultaneous implant placement for vertical ridge augmentation: a systematic review

• Main Authors: Luis Miguel Sáez-Alcaide (Author), Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann (Author), Luis Sánchez-Labrador (Author), Fabián Pérez-González (Author), Pedro Molinero-Mourelle (Author), Juan López-Quiles (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: SpringerOpen, 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/s40729-020-00280-0; 2198-4034
• Keywords: Vertical ridge augmentation; Alveolar ridge defects; Bone ring technique; Simultaneous implant placement; Medicine; R; Dentistry; RK1-715
• Source: International Journal of Implant Dentistry, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)

Abstract Background Dimensional changes after dental extraction frequently lead to situations in which bone augmentation procedures are required prior to dental implant placement. Bone ring technique (BRT) has been described as a one-stage approach to restore vertical alveolar ridge defects, in which an autogenous or allogeneic cortico-cancellous bone block graft is stabilized with a dental implant inserted simultaneously. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical performance of BRT. Materials and methods This review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted in four databases: (1) The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) via Ovid; (2) Web of Science (WOS); (3) SCOPUS; and (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool were used to assess the quality of evidence in the studies reviewed. Results Sixteen studies with a total of 186 patients treated with 219 bone rings bocks were included in the review. The studies showed a mean bone gain of 4.94 mm, mean bone resorption of 0.83 mm, and mean marginal bone loss of 0.57 mm after a mean follow-up period of 13.35 months. A mean bone ring survival rate of 97.26% and implant survival rate of 94.97% were recorded. Conclusions BRT would appear to be an adequate alternative technique for restoring single vertical alveolar ridge defects with simultaneous dental implant placement. However, further studies comparing this technique with other vertical ridge augmentation procedures in different clinical scenarios are needed to confirm the present results.