A comparative evaluation of implant supported zirconia framework gap of two CAD/CAM systems

• Main Authors: Narges Ameri (Author), Hakimeh Siadat (Author), Ahmad Reza Shamshiri (Author), Marzieh Alikhasi (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2016-11-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.

Summary

Background and Aims: Marginal accuracy is a crucial factor influencing the clinical long-term reliability of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fit of three-unit zirconia bridge frameworks fabricated using two different computer-aided design (CAD)/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) systems (AmannGirrbach and Zirkonzahn). Materials and Methods: The master model of 3-unit FDP was made of two implant abutments (AmannGirrbach and Zirkonzahn) from canine to second premolar. Twelve frameworks were manufactured using each fabricating system from semi-sintered zirconia blanks, which had to be sintered for final density after milling. After manufacturing, the absolute marginal discrepancy in each abutment were determined by means of Video Measurement System (VMS). The data were analyzed, using independent and paired t test (P=0.05). Results: For the premolar abutment, the absolute marginal discrepancy of frameworks fabricated by AmannGirrbach system was significantly greater than those of the other system (P=0.005). There was no significant difference between the marginal discrepancy of canine and premolar abutments (P>0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that the marginal fit of zirconia FDPs was significantly dependent on the CAD/CAM system used, but the abutment size was not an effective factor.

Item Description

1024-641X
2008-2444