Body posture and pulmonary function in mouth and nose breathing children: cross-sectional study

Abstract Introduction: Mouth breathing can lead to changes in body posture and pulmonary function. However, the consequences are still inconclusive and a number of studies are controversial. Objective: Evaluate and correlate spirometric parameters and postural measures in mouth breathing children, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jovana de Moura Milanesi (Author), Fernanda Pasinato (Author), Luana Cristina Berwig (Author), Ana Maria Toniolo da Silva (Author), Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues Corrêa (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Editora Champagnat.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2a638bbfb0ba4be3a83c203cfcaee052
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jovana de Moura Milanesi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fernanda Pasinato  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Luana Cristina Berwig  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ana Maria Toniolo da Silva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues Corrêa  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Body posture and pulmonary function in mouth and nose breathing children: cross-sectional study 
260 |b Editora Champagnat. 
500 |a 1980-5918 
500 |a 10.1590/1980-5918.030.001.ao12 
520 |a Abstract Introduction: Mouth breathing can lead to changes in body posture and pulmonary function. However, the consequences are still inconclusive and a number of studies are controversial. Objective: Evaluate and correlate spirometric parameters and postural measures in mouth breathing children, and compare them to nose breathers. Methods: two groups of 6 to 12 year-old children were evaluated: mouth breathers (MB, n = 55) and nose breathers (NB, n = 45). Spirometry and body posture analysis using photogrammetry (SAPo 0.68® v) were carried out. The following spirometric measures were evaluated: peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio (%) and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF 25-75%). Biophotogrammetric measures analyzed were: horizontal alignment of acromions (HAA) and anterior superior iliac spine (HAASIS), Charpy angle, horizontal alignment of the head (HAH), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), cervical distance (CD) and lumbar distance (LD). Results: There were no intergroup differences in spirometric and postural variables. Positive and moderate correlations were found between CL and CD measures with PEF, FEV1, FVC and FEF 25-75%, while weak correlations were observed between lumbar lordosis and PEF, FEV1 and FVC. Conclusion: The breathing mode had no influence on postural and respiratory measures. However, greater forward head posture, with smaller cervical lordosis, was related to higher lung volumes and flows in both groups. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Respiração Bucal 
690 |a Espirometria 
690 |a Postura 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Fisioterapia em Movimento, Vol 30, Iss 1, Pp 115-123 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-51502017000100115&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1980-5918 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2a638bbfb0ba4be3a83c203cfcaee052  |z Connect to this object online.