<b>Assessment of motor imagery ability and training</b>

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in motor imagery ability in response to a specific dart throwing training. Twelve subjects (17-22 years) with no previous experience in dart throwing or imagery agreed to participate. Changes in imagery ability were assessed using the Sports Imagery Ques...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Luiz Felix Rodacki (Author), Joice Mara Facco Stefanello (Author), Claudio Portilho Marques (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2010-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2a68c4aa8a41427ba0b41fae738b531c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a André Luiz Felix Rodacki  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Joice Mara Facco Stefanello  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Claudio Portilho Marques  |e author 
245 0 0 |a <b>Assessment of motor imagery ability and training</b> 
260 |b Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina,   |c 2010-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1415-8426 
500 |a 1980-0037 
520 |a The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in motor imagery ability in response to a specific dart throwing training. Twelve subjects (17-22 years) with no previous experience in dart throwing or imagery agreed to participate. Changes in imagery ability were assessed using the Sports Imagery Questionnaire before (pretreatment) and after (post-treatment) an imagery training program consisting of 10 sessions. Retention (RET) was assessed 2 weeks after training. The program included mental exercises designed to develop vivid images, to control one's own images, and to increase perception about performance. Comparison of the imagery training conditions (training alone, training accompanied, observing a colleague, and during assessment) showed no differences between the pretreatment, post-treatment and RET evaluations. Although imagery ability did not respond to training, significant differences between imagery domains (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and animic) were found (p<0.05), except between the visual and animic domains (p=0.58). These differences might be related to subject's domain preference subject during the imagery process and to the nature of the task in which the skill technique used seems to be a relevant aspect. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Imagery 
690 |a Ability 
690 |a Assessment 
690 |a Motor program 
690 |a Imagery 
690 |a Ability 
690 |a Assessment 
690 |a Motor program. 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, Vol 12, Iss 6, Pp 395-400 (2010) 
787 0 |n http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/13790/13512 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1415-8426 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1980-0037 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2a68c4aa8a41427ba0b41fae738b531c  |z Connect to this object online.