Indigenous communities' perceptions reveal threats and management options of wild edible plants in semiarid lands of northwestern Kenya

• Үндсэн зохиолчид: Wyclife Agumba Oluoch (Зохиогч), Cory Whitney (Зохиогч), Céline Termote (Зохиогч), Christian Borgemeister (Зохиогч), Christine B. Schmitt (Зохиогч)
• Формат: Ном
• Хэвлэсэн: BMC, 2023-05-01T00:00:00Z.
• Нөхцлүүд: article
• Онлайн хандалт: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/s13002-023-00584-6; 1746-4269
• Keywords: Conservation; Sustainable use; Wild food plants; Integrated participatory approach; Field survey; Focus group discussion; Other systems of medicine; RZ201-999; Botany; QK1-989
• Source: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2023)

Abstract Background Understanding how local communities perceive threats and management options of wild edible plants (WEPs) is essential in developing their conservation strategies and action plans. Due to their multiple use values, including nutrition, medicinal, construction, and cultural as well as biotic and abiotic pressures, WEPs are exposed to overexploitation, especially within arid and semiarid lands, and hence the need to manage and conserve them. We demonstrate how an understanding of indigenous communities' perceptions could be achieved through an integrated participatory approach involving focus group discussions (FGDs) and field plot surveys. Methods We conducted three FGDs between October 2020 and April 2021 within three community units in northwestern Kenya with different socioeconomic and environmental characteristics. We subsequently surveyed 240 field plots of size 1 ha each to assess threats facing WEPs within a 5 km buffer radius in every study community. We compared ranks of threats and management options across community units. Results Rankings of threats and management options differed across the three study communities. We obtained strong positive linear relationships between field and FGD rankings of threats facing WEPs. Climate change, overstocking, overharvesting, and invasive species were the highest-ranked threats. Mitigation of climate change, local knowledge preservation, selection, propagation, processing, and marketing of WEPs ranked high among possible management options irrespective of the socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of the community unit. Conclusions Our approach emphasizes the relevance of leveraging indigenous communities' perceptions and conducting field plot surveys to assess threats and management options for WEPs. Evaluating the effectiveness and cost-benefit implications of implementing the highly ranked management options could help determine potentially suitable habitats of the WEPs for conservation and management purposes, especially for priority WEPs.