A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains

To compare the rates of maxillary canine retraction and molar anchorage loss when using either NiTi springs or elastomeric chains delivering a known force with sliding edgewise mechanics.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bokas Jim (Author), Woods Michael (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Sciendo, 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2b2c955b37d84a4d9af6bc84ca8feece
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bokas Jim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Woods Michael  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains 
260 |b Sciendo,   |c 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2207-7480 
500 |a 10.2478/aoj-2006-0005 
520 |a To compare the rates of maxillary canine retraction and molar anchorage loss when using either NiTi springs or elastomeric chains delivering a known force with sliding edgewise mechanics. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Australasian Orthodontic Journal, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 39-46 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2006-0005 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2207-7480 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2b2c955b37d84a4d9af6bc84ca8feece  |z Connect to this object online.