A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains
To compare the rates of maxillary canine retraction and molar anchorage loss when using either NiTi springs or elastomeric chains delivering a known force with sliding edgewise mechanics.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Bokas Jim (Author), Woods Michael (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Sciendo,
2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Force degradation of different elastomeric chains and nickel titanium closed springs
by: Bruno Ubirajara Pires, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Canine retraction with nickel-titanium coil springs versus elastomeric chains: A systematic review
by: Mariam Chatuan, et al.
Published: (2024) -
In vitro comparison of force losses over time of orthodontic nickel-titanium closed springs, elastomeric chains, and active tie-backs
by: Emine Aydın, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Evaluation of space closure rate during canine retraction with nickel titanium closed coil spring and elastomeric chain.
by: Nada MS Al-Sayagh, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Deformation of nickel-titanium closed coil springs: an in vitro study
by: Camilla Ivini Viana Vieira, et al.