Comparing the effectiveness of brolucizumab therapy alone versus that combined with subthreshold micropulse laser exposure in the treatment of diabetic macular edema

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of blindness in working-age individuals in the developed countries. Studies have found that diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual impairment in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AO Giyasova (Author), NR Yangieva (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Ukrainian Society of Ophthalmologists, 2023-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2bb1f8a67e0147a9b0de227c9007d3e8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a AO Giyasova  |e author 
700 1 0 |a NR Yangieva  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparing the effectiveness of brolucizumab therapy alone versus that combined with subthreshold micropulse laser exposure in the treatment of diabetic macular edema 
260 |b Ukrainian Society of Ophthalmologists,   |c 2023-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.31288/oftalmolzh202321620 
500 |a 2412-8740 
520 |a Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of blindness in working-age individuals in the developed countries. Studies have found that diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual impairment in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of DME. Material and Methods: Eighty-two patients (153 eyes) with DME were divided into two treatment groups. Group 1 (37 patients, 68 eyes) was treated with injections of the anti-VEGF agent brolucizumab according to the one plus pro re nata (PRN) regimen (once plus as needed) only, whereas group 2 (45 patients, 85 eyes) received a combination of "one plus PRN" brolucizumab therapy with subthreshold micropulse laser exposure (SMPLE). Before and after treatment, a comprehensive ophthalmological examination was performed, including the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the height of retinal edema in the central fovea as assessed by optical coherence tomography. The parameters were assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Results: The percentage of patients with no need for additional anti-VEGF injections was substantially higher in the combined therapy group than in the monotherapy group (68.5% versus 12%, respectively, p <0.001). Conclusion: The combination treatment (intravitreal brolucizumab combined with SMPLE) for DME was effective in 68.5% of cases within 12 months. In this way, a steady resorption of DME is accomplished through antivasoproliferative and prolonged effects of brolucizumab and the SMPLE session. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a UK 
690 |a diabetic macular edema 
690 |a anti-vegf therapy 
690 |a subthreshold micropulse laser exposure 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Ophthalmology, Iss 2, Pp 16-20 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://ua.ozhurnal.com/index.php/files/article/view/21 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2412-8740 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2bb1f8a67e0147a9b0de227c9007d3e8  |z Connect to this object online.