L'étude de controverses pour une connaissance des pratiques et des institutions de recherches technoscientifiques

Socio-technical controversies can be an object of learning about democracy and a way to foster empowerment of students, through confrontation with a diversity of points of view. It is a question of developing among young people, from the identification of the actors of the controversy and a work on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Virginie Albe (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Université de Provence, 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2bb66c8c30cf4b0682c4ff4a18a6d9d7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Virginie Albe  |e author 
245 0 0 |a L'étude de controverses pour une connaissance des pratiques et des institutions de recherches technoscientifiques 
260 |b Université de Provence,   |c 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1635-4079 
500 |a 1775-433X 
500 |a 10.4000/questionsvives.6590 
520 |a Socio-technical controversies can be an object of learning about democracy and a way to foster empowerment of students, through confrontation with a diversity of points of view. It is a question of developing among young people, from the identification of the actors of the controversy and a work on their interests and their arguments, an epistemological complexification and to train them socio-politically, by keeping away the binary approach (for/against) which often structures the media presentations of controversies, and their pedagogical treatment. The analysis of the framing effects of the pedagogical sequence co-constructed with professionals (teachers and researchers) shows here that the pupils reproduce the discourse of the public debate by positioning themselves in favor of nanotechnologies as a responsible innovation, but in the same time pupils ethically reject the transhumanist perspectives of manipulation of the living and the human being. They also question the interest of nanotechnologies in spaces of deliberation without a pedagogical framework. Such results invite us to (re)consider the formats for dealing with controversies in science classes. 
546 |a FR 
690 |a Science-Technology-Society 
690 |a Technoscience 
690 |a Controversies 
690 |a controversies 
690 |a awareness 
690 |a critical pedagogy 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Questions Vives, Vol 37 (2022) 
787 0 |n http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/6590 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1635-4079 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1775-433X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2bb66c8c30cf4b0682c4ff4a18a6d9d7  |z Connect to this object online.