An in vitro evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal, Hyflex EDM, and WaveOne gold using microcomputed tomography

Aim: The study was to determine and compare the values of canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal (PTU), Hyflex EDM (HEDM), and WaveOne GOLD (WOG) using microcomputed tomography (Micro-CT). Methods: Sixty mandibular molar mesiobuccal canals were randomly allocated into three...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashwin Ravichandran (Author), Veni Ashok Baskaran (Author), Shankar Narayanan Gopal (Author), Venkatesan S Motilal (Author), Meenakshisundram Rajasekaran (Author), Anil Kumar Ramachandran (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim: The study was to determine and compare the values of canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal (PTU), Hyflex EDM (HEDM), and WaveOne GOLD (WOG) using microcomputed tomography (Micro-CT). Methods: Sixty mandibular molar mesiobuccal canals were randomly allocated into three groups, each with 20 samples: PTU (group one), HEDM (group two), and WOG (group three). Micro-CT was used to scan samples before and after instrumentation. Three-dimensional scans of root cross-sections at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm from the apex were obtained to measure canal transportation and centering ability. For statistical analysis, SPSS software was utilized. P = 0.05 was used as the significance level. Results: When compared all three systems, PTU files had the highest transportation and were less centered. HEDM and WOG showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Curved roots canals were shaped without any significant canal transportation by Hyflex EDM and WOG when compared with PTU files.
Item Description:2543-0831
10.4103/endo.endo_108_22