Transhiatal isoperistaltic colon interposition without cervical oesophagostomy in long-gap oesophageal atresia

Background: Oesophageal colonic interposition in oesophageal atresia (OA) patients is almost exclusively done as a staged operation with an initial oesophagostomy and gastrostomy followed by the definitive surgery months later. This study presents a series of patients in whom a cervical oesophagosto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cigdem Ulukaya Durakbasa (Author), Murat Mutus (Author), Gonca Gercel (Author), Selma Fettahoglu (Author), Hamit Okur (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2bf5438c3228456aae77159d875bc0e7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Cigdem Ulukaya Durakbasa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Murat Mutus  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gonca Gercel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Selma Fettahoglu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hamit Okur  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Transhiatal isoperistaltic colon interposition without cervical oesophagostomy in long-gap oesophageal atresia 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0189-6725 
500 |a 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_95_17 
520 |a Background: Oesophageal colonic interposition in oesophageal atresia (OA) patients is almost exclusively done as a staged operation with an initial oesophagostomy and gastrostomy followed by the definitive surgery months later. This study presents a series of patients in whom a cervical oesophagostomy was not performed before the substitution surgery. Patients and Methods: Records of EA patients were evaluated for those who underwent colon interposition without cervical oesophagostomy. Results: There were five patients: three with pure EA and two with proximal tracheo-oesophageal fistula. A delayed primary repair could not be performed because of intra-abdominally located distal pouch. The mean age at the time of definitive operation was 5.54 (±2.7) months and the mean weight was 6.24 (±1.3) kg. A right or a left colonic segment was used for interposition keeping the proximal anastomosis within the thorax. The post-operative results were quite satisfactory within a median follow-up period of 33.2 months. Conclusion: Avoiding cervical oesophagostomy and its inherent complications and drawbacks is possible in a subset of patients with long-gap EA who underwent colonic substitution surgery. This approach may be seen as an extension of the consensus that the native oesophagus should be preserved whenever possible, because it uses the native oesophagus in its entirety. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a colon interposition 
690 |a oesophageal atresia 
690 |a oesophageal substitution 
690 |a oesophagostomy 
690 |a long gap 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a RJ1-570 
690 |a Surgery 
690 |a RD1-811 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n African Journal of Paediatric Surgery, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 45-48 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2020;volume=17;issue=3;spage=45;epage=48;aulast=Durakbasa 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0189-6725 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2bf5438c3228456aae77159d875bc0e7  |z Connect to this object online.