Test the Effectiveness of Quantitative Linear-Quadratic-Based (qLQB) Model on Evaluating Irradiation-Induced Liver Injury (ILI) Against Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP)

Objectives: To test the effectiveness of quantitative linear-quadratic-based (qLQB) model on evaluating irradiation-induced liver injury (ILI) and establish the relation between the damaged ratio/percent (DRP) in qLQB model and normal tissue complication probility (NTCP). Materials and Methods: We e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han Bai (Author), Li Wang (Author), Wenhui Li (Author), Xuhong Liu (Author), Yaoxiong Xia (Author), Li Chang (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2c99b5fc405b43cbb7f70ea5a4c5f720
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Han Bai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Li Wang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wenhui Li  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Xuhong Liu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yaoxiong Xia  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Li Chang  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Test the Effectiveness of Quantitative Linear-Quadratic-Based (qLQB) Model on Evaluating Irradiation-Induced Liver Injury (ILI) Against Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1559-3258 
500 |a 10.1177/1559325820961721 
520 |a Objectives: To test the effectiveness of quantitative linear-quadratic-based (qLQB) model on evaluating irradiation-induced liver injury (ILI) and establish the relation between the damaged ratio/percent (DRP) in qLQB model and normal tissue complication probility (NTCP). Materials and Methods: We established the qLQB model to calculate the ratio/percent (RP) between damaged cell/functional subunit (FSU) and entire cell/FSU of liver for radiation dose response, tested the qLQB against the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model, and established relation between the RP and NTCP through analyzing the dose of 32 patients with cancer of abdominal cavity who were treated with radiation therapy at our department. Based on varied α/β and varied parameters for NTCP, we put the calculated results into varied arrays for the next analysis. We named the 2 groups of RPs: RP1 (α/β = 3.0, α = 0.03) and RP2 (α/β = 8.0, α = 0.26), and named the 2 groups of NTCPs: NTCP1 (n = 0.32, m = 0.15, TD50(1) = 4000 cGy) and NTCP2 (n = 1.10, m = 0.28, TD50(1) = 4050 cGy). Results: Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlations among the groups, the results were as follows: RP1 vs NTCP1, rs = 0.83827, p < 0.0001; RP1 vs NTCP2, rs = 0.83827, p < 0.0001; RP2 vs NTCP2, rs = 0.79289, p < 0.0001; and RP2 vs NTCP1, rs = 0.79289, p < 0.0001. Conclusions: There is a significant correlation between RP value and NTCP for evaluating ILI, and there is no difference between qLQB model and LKB model on evaluating ILI. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dose-Response, Vol 18 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820961721 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1559-3258 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2c99b5fc405b43cbb7f70ea5a4c5f720  |z Connect to this object online.