Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice

The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016 set explicit expectations for faculty scholarship. However, many non-tenure-track faculty have struggled with the scholarship portion of the academic tripart mission of clinical practice, teaching, and scholarship. Therefore, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cecilia Farias-Ruiz (Author), Theresa Byrd (Author), Eric J. MacLaughlin (Author), Ronald G. Hall 2nd (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2d08e6f1ee454b0c97a40d00bf95d93a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Cecilia Farias-Ruiz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Theresa Byrd  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eric J. MacLaughlin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ronald G. Hall 2nd  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/pharmacy11010031 
500 |a 2226-4787 
520 |a The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016 set explicit expectations for faculty scholarship. However, many non-tenure-track faculty have struggled with the scholarship portion of the academic tripart mission of clinical practice, teaching, and scholarship. Therefore, we sought to identify themes regarding the barriers, motivators, and potential solutions associated with non-tenure-track faculty scholarship. Four focus group interviews were held via videoconference during July 2021, which consisted of non-tenure-track faculty within the TTUHSC Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy. Each focus group answered a standard script of questions that were evaluated for face validity over a 30-60 min session. Twenty-two non-tenure-track faculty members (47% response) participated in one of the four focus group interviews. The four common barriers were insufficient time, lack of acknowledgment, obscurity of scholarship expectations, and a lack of resources and support. Scholarship's lasting impact on academia, students, and clinical practice was the one common motivator identified by the groups. The barriers identified were not unique to our faculty, despite the unique four-city structure of our program. Actions have continued to be taken to help address the barriers and potential solutions identified by the focus groups. In summary, our results echo that non-tenure-track faculty need more time and training to help them feel like they can meet institutional scholarship requirements. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a faculty 
690 |a scholarship 
690 |a research 
690 |a time 
690 |a pharmacy 
690 |a pharmacy practice 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Pharmacy, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 31 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/11/1/31 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2226-4787 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2d08e6f1ee454b0c97a40d00bf95d93a  |z Connect to this object online.