Validating an algorithm to identify metastatic gastric cancer in the absence of routinely collected TNM staging data

Abstract Background Accurate TNM stage information is essential for cancer health services research, but is often impractical and expensive to collect at the population-level. We evaluated algorithms using administrative healthcare data to identify patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Methods A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alyson L. Mahar (Author), Yunni Jeong (Author), Brandon Zagorski (Author), Natalie Coburn (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2018-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2db5eefda52b49f88d9b58724d87b12f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Alyson L. Mahar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yunni Jeong  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Brandon Zagorski  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Natalie Coburn  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Validating an algorithm to identify metastatic gastric cancer in the absence of routinely collected TNM staging data 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2018-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12913-018-3125-7 
500 |a 1472-6963 
520 |a Abstract Background Accurate TNM stage information is essential for cancer health services research, but is often impractical and expensive to collect at the population-level. We evaluated algorithms using administrative healthcare data to identify patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Methods A population-based cohort of gastric cancer patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2007 identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry were linked to routinely collected healthcare data. Reference standard data identifying metastatic disease were obtained from a province-wide chart review, according to the Collaborative Staging method. Algorithms to identify metastatic gastric cancer were created using administrative healthcare data from hospitalization, emergency department, and physician billing records. Time frames of data collection in the peri-diagnosis period, and the diagnosis codes used to identify metastatic disease were varied. Algorithm sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were evaluated. Results Of 2366 gastric cancer patients, included within the chart review, 54.3% had metastatic disease. Algorithm sensitivity ranged from 50.0- 90%, specificity ranged from 27.6 - 92.5%, and accuracy from 61.5 - 73.4%. Sensitivity and specificity were maximized when the most conservative list of diagnosis codes from hospitalization and outpatient records in the six months prior to and the six months following diagnosis were included. Conclusion Algorithms identifying metastatic gastric cancer can be used for research purposes using administrative healthcare data, although they are imperfect measures. The properties of these algorithms may be generalizable to other high fatality cancers and other healthcare systems. This study provides further support for the collection of population-based, TNM stage data. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Gastric adenocarcinoma 
690 |a Metastatic disease 
690 |a Staging 
690 |a Algorithm 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Health Services Research, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3125-7 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2db5eefda52b49f88d9b58724d87b12f  |z Connect to this object online.