Dental education: Lecture versus flipped and spaced learning

Background: Even though there are diverse varieties of teaching methods to motivate and educate students, not many are used in dental institutions, where most rely only on traditional lectures. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare traditional lectures with newer teaching methods, specif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shivani Kohli (Author), Ashwin Kumar Sukumar (Author), Cheah Tze Zhen (Author), Andrew Sim Lim Yew (Author), Alvena Ann Gomez (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_2f9aac2ca8b2499a92c6a2cea29387f2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shivani Kohli  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ashwin Kumar Sukumar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cheah Tze Zhen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Andrew Sim Lim Yew  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alvena Ann Gomez  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Dental education: Lecture versus flipped and spaced learning 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1735-3327 
500 |a 2008-0255 
500 |a 10.4103/1735-3327.266090 
520 |a Background: Even though there are diverse varieties of teaching methods to motivate and educate students, not many are used in dental institutions, where most rely only on traditional lectures. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare traditional lectures with newer teaching methods, specifically the flipped classroom and spaced learning method. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study Students were randomized to one of the teaching methods, and their short-term (immediately after teaching) and long-term (i.e., 6 months later) knowledge retention was assessed through multiple choice questions, followed by students feedback which was obtained using Trierer Inventar zur Lehrevaluation questionnaire. P≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: For short-term learning gains, spaced learning group (165.85) showed highest mean scores, followed by the traditional lecture group (163.70) and flipped classroom group (153.25).P value acquired through the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was statistically significant (0.003). For long-term knowledge retention, traditional lecture group has highest mean scores (147.50), followed by spaced learning group (146.90) and flipped classroom group (145.05) with no significant difference (P = 0.657). Conclusion: Spaced learning methodology was better than the traditional lecture method and the flipped classroom concerning knowledge gains when measured immediately after the application of learning method. For long-term knowledge retention, both the flipped classroom and spaced learning teaching methods were comparable to the traditional lecture method. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Feedback 
690 |a knowledge 
690 |a lecture 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dental Research Journal, Vol 16, Iss 5, Pp 289-297 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2019;volume=16;issue=5;spage=289;epage=297;aulast=Kohli 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3327 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2008-0255 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/2f9aac2ca8b2499a92c6a2cea29387f2  |z Connect to this object online.