Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax -Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate - skeletal and dental outcomes
Abstract Background Protraction of maxilla is usually the preferred and more commonly used treatment approach for skeletal Class III with a retrognathic maxilla. The aim of this study was the comparison of the skeletal and dental effects of two skeletally borne appliances for maxillary protraction:...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jan H. Willmann (Author), Manuel Nienkemper (Author), Nour Eldin Tarraf (Author), Benedict Wilmes (Author), Dieter Drescher (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
SpringerOpen,
2018-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study
by: Katyal Vandana, et al.
Published: (2016) -
A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask
by: Nour Eldin Tarraf, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Stability of the anterior arm of three different Hyrax hybrid expanders: an in vitro study
by: Gonzalo de la Iglesia, et al. -
Mini Hyrax vs Hyrax expanders in the rapid palatal expansion in adolescents with posterior crossbite: a randomized controlled clinical trial
by: Giordani Santos Silveira, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Effects of hybrid-Hyrax, Alt-RAMEC and miniscrew reinforced heavy Class III elastics in growing maxillary retrusive patients. A four-year follow-up pilot study
by: Papadopoulou Alexandra K., et al.
Published: (2017)