Telerehabilitation acceptance among patients during Circuit Breaker period: A retrospective study
Background and objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation (TR) was viewed as an ideal alternative to minimize infection risks with in-person rehabilitation. However, TR acceptability remains unclear as it is an unfamiliar mode of interaction for most patients. We aim to retrospecti...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
Elsevier,
2022-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background and objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation (TR) was viewed as an ideal alternative to minimize infection risks with in-person rehabilitation. However, TR acceptability remains unclear as it is an unfamiliar mode of interaction for most patients. We aim to retrospectively: (i) review the uptake rate of TR among patients, and (ii) explore their perceived barriers and facilitators of the service. Design: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted among eligible patients who were offered TR. Research data was extracted from medical records. Additionally, an anonymous patient satisfaction survey was conducted among the successfully enrolled patients, and the feedback was extracted from the form.gov.sg server. Result(s): 24·2% of the 314 eligible patients were successfully enrolled into TR. Preference for in-person rehabilitation was the top reason cited for declining the service. Among the 157 patients who declined the service, 38·2% of them preferred in-person rehabilitation over TR. Conclusion(s): A low uptake of TR services was demonstrated, with preference for in-person rehabilitation being the majority cited reason for decline. Reconciling the differences in patients' perceptions between in-person rehabilitation and TR may improve uptake rates. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | 2772-6533 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100049 |