Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE: Local anesthetic solutions with vasoconstrictors are not contraindicated in hypertensive patients, but due to their hemodynamic effects, local anesthetics without vasoconstrictors are mainly preferred by the clinicians. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamic effects of three dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahadir Ezmek (Author), Ahmet Arslan (Author), Cagri Delilbasi (Author), Kemal Sencift (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of São Paulo, 2010-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_318b079a83ec4a2ba87a47dfcd0b97c2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bahadir Ezmek  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ahmet Arslan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cagri Delilbasi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kemal Sencift  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients 
260 |b University of São Paulo,   |c 2010-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1590/S1678-77572010000400006 
500 |a 1678-7757 
500 |a 1678-7765 
520 |a OBJECTIVE: Local anesthetic solutions with vasoconstrictors are not contraindicated in hypertensive patients, but due to their hemodynamic effects, local anesthetics without vasoconstrictors are mainly preferred by the clinicians. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamic effects of three different local anesthetics without vasoconstrictors during tooth extraction in hypertensive patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-five mandibular molars and premolars were extracted in 60 hypertensive patients (29 females and 31 males; mean age: 66.95 ± 10.87 years; range: 38 to 86 years old). Inferior alveolar and buccal nerve blocks were performed with 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl), 2% prilocaine HCl or 3% mepivacaine HCl without vasoconstrictor. Hemodynamic parameters namely systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), saturation rate (SR), rate pressure product (RPP) and pressure rate quotient (PRQ) were investigated before and at different intervals after anesthetic injection. RESULTS: The hemodynamic effects of the three agents were similar to each other, although some significance was observed for DBP, MAP, RPP and PRQ values in the lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine groups. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor can be safely used in hypertensive patients. It is advisable that dental practitioners select anesthetic solutions for hypertensive patients considering their cardiovascular effects in order to provide patient comfort and safety. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Hypertension 
690 |a Vasoconstrictor agents 
690 |a Hemodynamics 
690 |a Anesthesia 
690 |a Tooth extraction 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Applied Oral Science, Vol 18, Iss 4, Pp 354-359 (2010) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400006 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7757 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7765 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/318b079a83ec4a2ba87a47dfcd0b97c2  |z Connect to this object online.