Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients
OBJECTIVE: Local anesthetic solutions with vasoconstrictors are not contraindicated in hypertensive patients, but due to their hemodynamic effects, local anesthetics without vasoconstrictors are mainly preferred by the clinicians. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamic effects of three dif...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Bahadir Ezmek (Author), Ahmet Arslan (Author), Cagri Delilbasi (Author), Kemal Sencift (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
University of São Paulo,
2010-08-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparison of O2 saturation, heart and respiratory rate following injection of vasoconstrictor containing anesthetic (lidocaine 2%) and without vasoconstrictor anesthetic (Mepivacaine)
by: Bayat M., et al.
Published: (2005) -
Analysis of Hemodynamic Changes after Administration of Mepivacaine HCL 3% with Prilocaine 3% Solution + Felypressin
by: Ehsan Aliabadi, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Efficacy of lidocaine versus mepivacaine in the management of myofascial pain
by: Hamad Albagieh, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Comparative Preclinical Study of Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers
by: Romain Brusini, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Comparison of the success of inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia in the mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis using two anesthetic solutions of prilocaine and mepivacaine: A randomized controlled clinical trial
by: Mahsa Eskandarinezhad, et al.
Published: (2023)