Intuitive eating, objective weight status and physical indicators of health

Summary Introduction Intuitive eating (IE) has emerged as a weight‐neutral approach to health promotion for those with overweight/obesity. This weight‐neutral paradigm has some support, although research thus far has often neglected to control for potential confounds (i.e. objective weight status an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. G. Keirns (Author), M. A. W. Hawkins (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wiley, 2019-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_31a8fdf2ae754c61bf6e3a5850b7c08d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a N. G. Keirns  |e author 
700 1 0 |a M. A. W. Hawkins  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Intuitive eating, objective weight status and physical indicators of health 
260 |b Wiley,   |c 2019-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2055-2238 
500 |a 10.1002/osp4.359 
520 |a Summary Introduction Intuitive eating (IE) has emerged as a weight‐neutral approach to health promotion for those with overweight/obesity. This weight‐neutral paradigm has some support, although research thus far has often neglected to control for potential confounds (i.e. objective weight status and demographics) and foundational studies are lacking. The objective of the current study was to observe the unique association of IE with physical health indicators in a sample of adults, independent of objective weight status. Methods Participants were 248 adults (32 ± 14 years old, 73% female, 64% White) of all weight categories (18.2-55.3 kg m−2), with an average body mass index (BMI) of 30 ± 8 kg m−2. IE was measured with the Intuitive Eating Scale‐2 (IES‐2). BMI was objectively measured in‐lab. Health indicators included blood pressure (BP) and fasting glucose. Results A series of hierarchical linear regressions revealed no significant associations between IE and systolic BP (β = −0.076, P = 0.256), diastolic BP (DBP; β = −0.122, P = 0.073) or fasting glucose (β = 0.047, P = 0.500) after controlling for BMI. All effects sizes were small or below (f2 = 0.00 to −0.04). Sensitivity analyses revealed significantly lower DBP in high intuitive eaters versus low when analysed with a t‐test, t(111.651) = 3.602, P < 0.001, Levene corrected; however, after controlling for relevant covariates (i.e. BMI and demographics), analysis of covariance revealed no difference in DBP between groups, F(1, 116) = 0.330, P = 0.567. No significant differences in systolic BP or fasting glucose were observed between low and high intuitive eaters before or after considering covariates. Conclusions In sum, this study investigated associations between IE and common indicators of physical health after controlling for objective weight status. Findings revealed no unique relationship between IE and physical health, and any IE-physical health relationships that were observed were accounted for BMI and/or demographic factors. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Blood pressure 
690 |a eating behaviours 
690 |a glucose 
690 |a weight control 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Obesity Science & Practice, Vol 5, Iss 5, Pp 408-415 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.359 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2055-2238 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/31a8fdf2ae754c61bf6e3a5850b7c08d  |z Connect to this object online.