Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients

Different reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prost...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sheila Cavalca CORTELLI (Author), Fernando Oliveira COSTA (Author), Sigmar de Mello RODE (Author), Alex Nogueira HAAS (Author), Ana Karina Pinto de ANDRADE (Author), Claudio Mendes PANNUTI (Author), Elaine Cristina ESCOBAR (Author), Eliete Rodrigues de ALMEIDA (Author), José Roberto CORTELLI (Author), Vinicius PEDRAZZI (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica, 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_31e3d8a9e18a4fc0b5fd79d70f592d2a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sheila Cavalca CORTELLI  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fernando Oliveira COSTA  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sigmar de Mello RODE  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alex Nogueira HAAS  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ana Karina Pinto de ANDRADE  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Claudio Mendes PANNUTI  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elaine Cristina ESCOBAR  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eliete Rodrigues de ALMEIDA  |e author 
700 1 0 |a José Roberto CORTELLI  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vinicius PEDRAZZI  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients 
260 |b Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica,   |c 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1807-3107 
500 |a 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0020 
520 |a Different reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prosthesis replacement and prosthetic pillar loss are generally associated with caries and periodontal disease recurrence. Therefore, the present study undertook to make a critical review of the literature, aiming at discussing the main aspects related to chemical agent prescriptions for dental prosthesis wearers. Most of the articles were selected based on relevance, methods and availability in regard to the specific subject under investigation, without considering publication year limitations. Different types of prostheses and their impact on teeth and other oral tissues were reported. It was demonstrated that there is greater biofilm buildup and increased inflammatory levels in the presence of different types of prostheses, suggesting that additional measures are required both on population-wide and individual levels in order to control these factors. Mechanical control consists of a combination of manual or electric toothbrush and toothpaste, as well as specific devices for interdental cleaning. Although many chemical agents exhibit antimicrobial benefits when used for prosthesis disinfection, only a few agents can be used safely without causing damage. Regarding the selection of antiseptics by the overall population, chlorhexidine is the most indicated in the short term and in sporadic cases. The most indicated adjuncts to overcome the deficiencies and limitations of daily mechanical biofilm control are products containing essential oils as active ingredients. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Mouthwashes 
690 |a Biofilms 
690 |a Dental Prosthesis 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Brazilian Oral Research, Vol 28, Iss spe (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000200201&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1807-3107 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/31e3d8a9e18a4fc0b5fd79d70f592d2a  |z Connect to this object online.