Effect of micro-osteoperforations on rate of space closure by mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction: A randomized clinical trial
Background: Micro-osteoperforations is one of the non-invasive surgical techniques used in attempt to accelerate OTM. Conflicting reports on its effectiveness has been reported in the literature. Objectives: The objectives of this trial were to investigate the effect of micro-osteoperforations on th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2021-04-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_3418def1d38d4c53b51c243e2da53c91 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Pradeep Raghav |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Amit kumar Khera |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Pranav Bhasin |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Effect of micro-osteoperforations on rate of space closure by mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction: A randomized clinical trial |
260 | |b Elsevier, |c 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2212-4268 | ||
500 | |a 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.01.010 | ||
520 | |a Background: Micro-osteoperforations is one of the non-invasive surgical techniques used in attempt to accelerate OTM. Conflicting reports on its effectiveness has been reported in the literature. Objectives: The objectives of this trial were to investigate the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of space closure and on molar anchorage loss during mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction. Trial design: A single center, parallel arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Method: Sixty, male and female subjects (age range 16-25 years) having Class I bimaxillary protrusion or Class II div 1 malocclusion, who required fixed mechanotherapy with either upper 1st premolar or all four 1st premolar extractions were allocated into two groups using 1:1 allocation ratio. The allocation was done by block randomization method with a block size of 6. In the experimental group, 5 MOPs per side were performed only once just before the en-masse anterior retraction. Mini-screws were placed in order to obtain maximum anchorage. Impressions were taken every month till 4 months and rate of space closure was measured on 3D study models. Results: Data of 27 subjects in control (attrition = 3) and 28 subjects in experimental group (attrition = 2) were analyzed at the end of this trial. There was a statistically significant increase in the rate of en-masse retraction for the 1st month(p = 0.001,95%CI, 0.17, 0.37 mm) but there was no statistically significant difference for the subsequent 2nd (p = 0.450,95%CI,0.13,0.43 mm), 3rd(p = 0.204,95%CI,0.23,0.47 mm) and 4th month (p = 0.680,95%CI,0.21,0.41 mm) between experimental and control groups. There was also no difference (p > 0.05) in molar anchorage loss between both groups at all time intervals. Conclusion: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) did not accelerate the rate of anterior en-masse retraction over a period of 4 months; however, it temporarily increases the rate of retraction only for first month and no affect on molar anchorage. Trial registration: The trial was registered at www.ctri.nic.in with CTRI No- CTRI/2019/03/018140). | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Micro osteoperforation | ||
690 | |a En-masse retraction | ||
690 | |a TAD | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 185-191 (2021) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426821000105 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2212-4268 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3418def1d38d4c53b51c243e2da53c91 |z Connect to this object online. |