Ethics of Pediatric and Young Adult Medical Decision-Making: Case-Based Discussions Exploring Consent, Capacity, and Surrogate Decision-Making

Introduction Most medical decisions in pediatrics involve surrogate decision-makers. Because of this, pediatricians are even more likely to encounter ethical conflicts and dilemmas surrounding medical decision-making. Pediatricians continue to report a lack of preparedness to manage situations when...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer deSante-Bertkau (Author), Lori A. Herbst (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_342170b49f4a434f8d6f3510ca817c47
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jennifer deSante-Bertkau  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lori A. Herbst  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Ethics of Pediatric and Young Adult Medical Decision-Making: Case-Based Discussions Exploring Consent, Capacity, and Surrogate Decision-Making 
260 |b Association of American Medical Colleges,   |c 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11094 
500 |a 2374-8265 
520 |a Introduction Most medical decisions in pediatrics involve surrogate decision-makers. Because of this, pediatricians are even more likely to encounter ethical conflicts and dilemmas surrounding medical decision-making. Pediatricians continue to report a lack of preparedness to manage situations when conflicts and dilemmas arise, suggesting a gap in education. In response to this gap, we developed a module on the ethics of medical decision-making focused on pediatrics. Methods The Ethics of Pediatric and Young Adult Medical Decision-Making module included three case-based, small-group sessions on decision-making capacity and advance directives, parental decision-making, and informed consent and adolescent assent. Session materials were developed based on expert opinion and previously published content. Sessions were developed for pediatric residents; however, medical students rotating on pediatrics also participated in most sessions. Trainees completed pre- and postsession assessments of comfort and understanding. Results An average of 19 learners completed each session. Understanding of ethical principles increased after each session. Seventy-nine percent of trainees reported increased understanding of ethical principles related to decision-making capacity, and 88% reported increased understanding of standards of surrogate decision-making. Following the session on obtaining consent and assent, 71% of trainees reported comfort obtaining consent compared to 57% reporting comfort obtaining assent. Discussion This module successfully increased trainee comfort with many ethical issues related to pediatric medical decision-making. Areas where trainee comfort was still low postsession-specifically, obtaining consent or assent-are content areas where actual practice of these psychomotor skills is likely necessary. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a Medical Ethics 
690 |a Ethics 
690 |a Bioethics 
690 |a Medical Decision-Making 
690 |a Ethical Principles 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n MedEdPORTAL, Vol 17 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11094 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2374-8265 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/342170b49f4a434f8d6f3510ca817c47  |z Connect to this object online.