Comparison of traditional anesthesia method and jet injector anesthesia method (MadaJet XL®) for Nexplanon® insertion and removal
Abstract Background This study compared a needle-free anesthesia method with traditional local anesthesia for insertion and removal of Nexplanon® long-acting removable contraceptive device. In our clinic, patients often avoid this highly effective form of contraception due to fear of needles. We sou...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | G. Anthony Wilson (Author), Julie W. Jeter (Author), William S. Dabbs (Author), Amy Barger Stevens (Author), Robert E. Heidel (Author), Shaunta' M. Chamberlin (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2020-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Needle-Free Jet Injectors and Nanosuspensions: Exploring the Potential of an Unexpected Pair
by: Michele Schlich, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of EMLA and needleless jet anesthesia in non-surgical periodontal therapy
by: Rajan Gupta, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
by: Allan Carlos Araújo de Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2019) -
The jet jockeys
by: Stockheker, R. W.; Kiemle, H. W. (Henry William), 1908-1969 [Illustrator] -
Blood on my jets
by: Budrys, Algis, 1931-2008; Ebel, Alex, 1932-2013 [Illustrator]