Health systems research in fragile and conflict affected states: a qualitative study of associated challenges

Abstract Background High quality health systems research (HSR) in fragile and conflict-affected states (FCAS) is essential to guiding the policies and programmes that will improve access to health services and, ultimately, health outcomes. Yet, conducting HSR in FCAS is challenging. An understanding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aniek Woodward (Author), Kate Sheahan (Author), Tim Martineau (Author), Egbert Sondorp (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2017-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3707c0e4848d4b9bbf824e9cc0d9667b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Aniek Woodward  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kate Sheahan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tim Martineau  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Egbert Sondorp  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Health systems research in fragile and conflict affected states: a qualitative study of associated challenges 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2017-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12961-017-0204-x 
500 |a 1478-4505 
520 |a Abstract Background High quality health systems research (HSR) in fragile and conflict-affected states (FCAS) is essential to guiding the policies and programmes that will improve access to health services and, ultimately, health outcomes. Yet, conducting HSR in FCAS is challenging. An understanding of these challenges is essential to tackling them and to supporting research conducted in these complex environments. Led by the Thematic Working Group on Health Systems in FCAS, the primary aim of this study was to develop a research agenda on HSR in FCAS. The secondary aim was to identify the challenges associated with conducting HSR in these contexts. This paper presents these challenges. Methods Guided by a purposely-selected steering group, this qualitative study collected respondents' perspectives through an online survey (n = 61) and a group discussion at the Third Global Symposium on HSR in September 2014 (n = 11). Respondents with knowledge and/or experience of HSR in FCAS were intentionally recruited. Results Of those ever involved in HSR in FCAS (45/61, 75%), almost all (98%) experienced challenges in conducting their research. Challenges fall under three broad thematic areas: (1) lack of appropriate support; (2) complex local research environment, including access constraints, weak local research capacity, collaboration challenges and lack of trust in the research process; and (3) limited research application, including rapidly outdated findings and lack of engagement with the research process and results. Conclusions This study shows that those familiar with HSR in FCAS face many challenges in gaining support for and in conducting and applying high-quality research. There is a need for more sustainable support, including commitment to and long-term funding of HSR in FCAS; investment in capacity building within FCAS to meet the challenges related to implementation of research in these complex environments; relationship and trust building among stakeholders involved in HSR, particularly between local and international researchers and between researchers and participants; and innovative and flexible approaches to research design and implementation in these insecure and rapidly changing contexts. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Health systems research 
690 |a Challenges 
690 |a Fragile states 
690 |a Conflict-affected states 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-017-0204-x 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1478-4505 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3707c0e4848d4b9bbf824e9cc0d9667b  |z Connect to this object online.