Growth outcome at 2 years using Fenton and Intergrowth-21st charts in infants less than 1500 g
Introduction: There is no consensus on which neonatal chart is best to use in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. The aim of the study was to compare the Fenton 2013 and Intergrowth-21st (IW-21) charts based on their predictive ability for somatometry at 2 years, as well as to analyze factors rela...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Lara González García (Author), Enrique García López (Author), Belén Fernández Colomer (Author), Laura Mantecón Fernández (Author), Sonia Lareu Vidal (Author), Marta Suárez Rodríguez (Author), Rosa Arias Llorente (Author), Gonzalo Solís Sánchez (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2022-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Extrauterine Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Concordance Between Fenton 2013 and INTERGROWTH-21st Growth Charts
by: Lara González-García, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Comparison of application of Fenton, Intergrowth-21st and WHO growth charts in a population of Polish newborns
by: Dominik Jakubowski, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Comparison of Fenton and Intergrowth-21st growth charts: a retrospective study of preterm neonates at ≤34 weeks
by: Kirankumar Haridas, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Comparison of intergrowth-21st and Fenton curves for evaluation of premature newborns
by: Lorena Oliveira Peixoto, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Infant growth by INTERGROWTH‐21st and Fenton Growth Charts: Predicting 1‐year anthropometry in South African preterm infants
by: Sanja Nel, et al.
Published: (2024)