Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control

Aim: The objective of this study was to measure and compare the in vitro performance of active and passive self-ligating brackets in orthodontic rotation by means of an electromagnetic field simulation. Methods: The study sample consisted of 32 mandibular right central incisor brackets (n=8), slot 0...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sérgio Giamas Iafigliola (Author), José Guilherme Neves (Author), Heloísa Cristina Valdrighi (Author), Ana Paula Terossi de Godoi (Author), Wiliam C. Custódio (Author), Mário Vedovello Filho (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2018-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_376dae3947db419494dcb98e14fe8120
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sérgio Giamas Iafigliola  |e author 
700 1 0 |a José Guilherme Neves  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Heloísa Cristina Valdrighi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ana Paula Terossi de Godoi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wiliam C. Custódio  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mário Vedovello Filho  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control 
260 |b Universidade Estadual de Campinas,   |c 2018-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8653852 
500 |a 1677-3225 
520 |a Aim: The objective of this study was to measure and compare the in vitro performance of active and passive self-ligating brackets in orthodontic rotation by means of an electromagnetic field simulation. Methods: The study sample consisted of 32 mandibular right central incisor brackets (n=8), slot 0.022", that were divided into the following groups: 1) BioQuick® (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) active brackets; 2) In-Ovation®R (Dentsply-GAC, Central Islip, New York, USA) active brackets; 3) Damon-Q® (Ormco, Orange, California, USA) passive brackets, and 4) Smartclip® (3M, Monrovia, California, USA) passive brackets. The orthodontic wire used was CuNiTi round section 0.016", thermoactivated at 35o C (ORMCO-Orthodontics Glendora, California, USA). The experiment was performed in a simulator machine, composed of two fixed lateral axes and a movable central axis, which simulated the dental rotation. Qualitative analysis (n = 4) was performed using SEM. After the descriptive and exploratory analysis, the yield and grade data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: In-Ovation®R brackets showed significantly higher yield than BioQuick® and Damon-Q®. Damon-Q® brackets presented a significantly lower mean value than In-Ovation R and Smartclip®. BioQuick® did not differ significantly from Damon-Q® and Smartclip®. In-Ovation®R did not differ significantly from Smartclip®. Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that there is a difference in rotational control in the different self-ligating brackets tested being the best rotational control was the In-Ovation R® group (active), followed in descending order by the groups Smartclip® (passive), Bioquick® (active) and Damon Q® (passive). 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Rotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets. 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, Vol 17 (2018) 
787 0 |n https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1677-3225 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/376dae3947db419494dcb98e14fe8120  |z Connect to this object online.