Why Does the Evaluation of Research Need to be Reformed?
The evaluation of scientific research already has an extensive and well-structured literature on its objects, motives, methods and procedures, criteria and standards, difficulties, and results. It hardly needs elaborate philosophical underpinnings as there is normally, but not always, a consensus ar...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Chris L. S. Coryn (Author), Michael Scriven (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University,
2007-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Why Does Running an Electronic Journal Need Any Money?
by: Michael Scriven
Published: (2007) -
Are National-Level Research Evaluation Models Valid, Credible, Useful, Cost-Effective, and Ethical?
by: Chris L. S. Coryn, et al.
Published: (2007) -
The Interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Evaluation: Reflections on Its Development and First Seven Years
by: Chris L. S. Coryn, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Why does the world need another rotavirus vaccine?
by: Richard L Ward, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Review of Research Evaluation, Volumes 13(3), 14(1), and 14(2)
by: Chris L. S. Coryn
Published: (2006)